about
Evaluating the Utility of Vector Differences for Lexical Relation Learning (arxiv.org)
2 points by snake117 on Sep 23, 2015 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: Subtracting one word's meaning-vector from another leaves a difference that points at the relation between them, like take-took. Tested across many relation types instead of hand-picked analogy puzzles, a classifier trained on these differences worked well even on unseen word pairs.

Abstract · Take and Took, Gaggle and Goose, Book and Read: Evaluating the Utility of Vector Differences for Lexical Relation Learning

Recent work on word embeddings has shown that simple vector subtraction over pre-trained embeddings is surprisingly effective at capturing different lexical relations, despite lacking explicit supervision. Prior work has evaluated this intriguing result using a word analogy prediction formulation and hand-selected relations, but the generality of the finding over a broader range of lexical relation types and different learning settings has not been evaluated. In this paper, we carry out such an evaluation in two learning settings: (1) spectral clustering to induce word relations, and (2) supervised learning to classify vector differences into relation types. We find that word embeddings capture a surprising amount of information, and that, under suitable supervised training, vector subtraction generalises well to a broad range of relations, including over unseen lexical items.

Ekaterina Vylomova, Laura Rimell, Trevor Cohn, Timothy Baldwin
arXiv:1509.01692 · cs.CL · submitted Sep 5, 2015 · updated Aug 13, 2016
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN