In plain words: Design rules borrowed from physics and programming constrain recurrent networks so their parts only combine in meaningful ways, like refusing to add meters to seconds. Despite being more restricted, these networks trained with lower error and matched the generalization of standard designs.
Abstract
Recurrent neural networks are increasing popular models for sequential learning. Unfortunately, although the most effective RNN architectures are perhaps excessively complicated, extensive searches have not found simpler alternatives. This paper imports ideas from physics and functional programming into RNN design to provide guiding principles. From physics, we introduce type constraints, analogous to the constraints that forbids adding meters to seconds. From functional programming, we require that strongly-typed architectures factorize into stateless learnware and state-dependent firmware, reducing the impact of side-effects. The features learned by strongly-typed nets have a simple semantic interpretation via dynamic average-pooling on one-dimensional convolutions. We also show that strongly-typed gradients are better behaved than in classical architectures, and characterize the representational power of strongly-typed nets. Finally, experiments show that, despite being more constrained, strongly-typed architectures achieve lower training and comparable generalization error to classical architectures.
David Balduzzi, Muhammad Ghifary
arXiv:1602.02218 · cs.LG, cs.NE · submitted Feb 6, 2016 · updated May 24, 2016
abstract · pdf · html · 10 pages, final version, ICML 2016