about
Concrete Problems in AI Safety (arxiv.org)
17 points by sonabinu on Jun 30, 2016 | hide | past | pdf | 3 comments on HN

In plain words: AI systems can cause accidents—unintended harmful behavior from poor design—and this survey sorts those risks into five research problems, from wrong goals and reward gaming to hard-to-check supervision, risky trial-and-error, and unfamiliar situations. It reviews past work and suggests directions for cutting-edge AI.

Abstract

Rapid progress in machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) has brought increasing attention to the potential impacts of AI technologies on society. In this paper we discuss one such potential impact: the problem of accidents in machine learning systems, defined as unintended and harmful behavior that may emerge from poor design of real-world AI systems. We present a list of five practical research problems related to accident risk, categorized according to whether the problem originates from having the wrong objective function ("avoiding side effects" and "avoiding reward hacking"), an objective function that is too expensive to evaluate frequently ("scalable supervision"), or undesirable behavior during the learning process ("safe exploration" and "distributional shift"). We review previous work in these areas as well as suggesting research directions with a focus on relevance to cutting-edge AI systems. Finally, we consider the high-level question of how to think most productively about the safety of forward-looking applications of AI.

Dario Amodei, Chris Olah, Jacob Steinhardt, Paul Christiano, John Schulman, Dan Mané
arXiv:1606.06565 · cs.AI, cs.LG · submitted Jun 21, 2016 · updated Jul 25, 2016
abstract · pdf · html · 29 pages

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Nov 2017 (2 points, 0 comments) · Jul 2016 (1 point, 0 comments) · Jun 2016 (2 points, 0 comments)

This was posted earlier, with a link to the OpenAI blogpost: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11950687
Hmm article seems to miss socialeconomics aspects. Can it put too much power or wealth in hands of few? Can hackers cheat AI to its advantage?is it more risky than current systems?

Analogy, the article analyze as if main risk of nuclear power was accidents or uncontrolled reactions. However the main problem with nuclear is with weapons which could give destructive power to few individuals. Sometimes civilian use cases can be mixed with military one (e.g. Iran, North Korea).

It doesn't claim to give all the aspects; only some concrete and fairly well-specified ones.