In plain words: Deep networks can memorize random noise, but tests show they learn simple patterns first and treat noise differently from real data. Well-tuned dropout can block that memorization without hurting real accuracy, so memorization depends on the data, not just network size.
Abstract
We examine the role of memorization in deep learning, drawing connections to capacity, generalization, and adversarial robustness. While deep networks are capable of memorizing noise data, our results suggest that they tend to prioritize learning simple patterns first. In our experiments, we expose qualitative differences in gradient-based optimization of deep neural networks (DNNs) on noise vs. real data. We also demonstrate that for appropriately tuned explicit regularization (e.g., dropout) we can degrade DNN training performance on noise datasets without compromising generalization on real data. Our analysis suggests that the notions of effective capacity which are dataset independent are unlikely to explain the generalization performance of deep networks when trained with gradient based methods because training data itself plays an important role in determining the degree of memorization.
Devansh Arpit, Stanisław Jastrzębski, Nicolas Ballas, David Krueger, Emmanuel Bengio, Maxinder S. Kanwal, Tegan Maharaj, Asja Fischer, Aaron Courville, Yoshua Bengio, Simon Lacoste-Julien
arXiv:1706.05394 · stat.ML, cs.LG · submitted Jun 16, 2017 · updated Jul 1, 2017
abstract · pdf · html · Appears in Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2017), Devansh Arpit, Stanisław Jastrzębski, Nicolas Ballas, and David Krueger contributed equally to this work