about
Diagnose irregular heart rhythms better than a cardiologist (arxiv.org)
13 points by blacksmythe on Aug 14, 2017 | hide | past | pdf | 1 comment on HN

In plain words: A pattern-recognition network trained on single-lead wearable ECG traces labels rhythms as normal or one of many arrhythmias, using a patient set over 500 times larger than before. It caught more true arrhythmias and raised fewer false alarms than the average of six cardiologists.

Abstract · Cardiologist-Level Arrhythmia Detection with Convolutional Neural Networks

We develop an algorithm which exceeds the performance of board certified cardiologists in detecting a wide range of heart arrhythmias from electrocardiograms recorded with a single-lead wearable monitor. We build a dataset with more than 500 times the number of unique patients than previously studied corpora. On this dataset, we train a 34-layer convolutional neural network which maps a sequence of ECG samples to a sequence of rhythm classes. Committees of board-certified cardiologists annotate a gold standard test set on which we compare the performance of our model to that of 6 other individual cardiologists. We exceed the average cardiologist performance in both recall (sensitivity) and precision (positive predictive value).

Pranav Rajpurkar, Awni Y. Hannun, Masoumeh Haghpanahi, Codie Bourn, Andrew Y. Ng
arXiv:1707.01836 · cs.CV · submitted Jul 6, 2017
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Jul 2017 (4 points, 0 comments) · Jul 2017 (1 point, 0 comments)

Interesting read about electrocardiogram (ECG), machine learning (ML) and convolutional neural network (CNN) that outperforms humans in diagnosis, since it has a large training data set. Keep in mind though, that two out of five writers of the paper are from http://irhythmtech.com/ and the measurements were taken with their Zio product (patch you wear that records for 14 days), but that doesn't make the results any less valuable.