about
Systematic evaluation of CNN advances on the ImageNet (arxiv.org)
3 points by sytelus on Dec 3, 2017 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: Tested many design and training tweaks for image-recognizing networks one at a time and together on a standard object-sorting task. Their gains mostly added up independently, and using 128-pixel images gave the same conclusions as full-size ones about ten times faster.

Abstract

The paper systematically studies the impact of a range of recent advances in CNN architectures and learning methods on the object categorization (ILSVRC) problem. The evalution tests the influence of the following choices of the architecture: non-linearity (ReLU, ELU, maxout, compatibility with batch normalization), pooling variants (stochastic, max, average, mixed), network width, classifier design (convolutional, fully-connected, SPP), image pre-processing, and of learning parameters: learning rate, batch size, cleanliness of the data, etc. The performance gains of the proposed modifications are first tested individually and then in combination. The sum of individual gains is bigger than the observed improvement when all modifications are introduced, but the "deficit" is small suggesting independence of their benefits. We show that the use of 128x128 pixel images is sufficient to make qualitative conclusions about optimal network structure that hold for the full size Caffe and VGG nets. The results are obtained an order of magnitude faster than with the standard 224 pixel images.

Dmytro Mishkin, Nikolay Sergievskiy, Jiri Matas
arXiv:1606.02228 · cs.NE, cs.CV, cs.LG · submitted Jun 7, 2016 · updated Jun 13, 2016
abstract · pdf · html · Submitted to CVIU Special Issue on Deep Learning. Updated dataset quality experiment

add comment on HN