about
Closing the Gap Between Performance and Interpretability in Visual Reasoning (arxiv.org)
4 points by andyjohnson0 on Sep 12, 2018 | hide | past | pdf | 1 comment on HN

In plain words: A visual question-answering system is built from simple, visible reasoning steps—like locating objects and comparing them—so you can watch how it reaches an answer. It hits 99.1% accuracy on a standard image-question test, matching the best opaque systems while staying readable.

Abstract · Transparency by Design: Closing the Gap Between Performance and Interpretability in Visual Reasoning

Visual question answering requires high-order reasoning about an image, which is a fundamental capability needed by machine systems to follow complex directives. Recently, modular networks have been shown to be an effective framework for performing visual reasoning tasks. While modular networks were initially designed with a degree of model transparency, their performance on complex visual reasoning benchmarks was lacking. Current state-of-the-art approaches do not provide an effective mechanism for understanding the reasoning process. In this paper, we close the performance gap between interpretable models and state-of-the-art visual reasoning methods. We propose a set of visual-reasoning primitives which, when composed, manifest as a model capable of performing complex reasoning tasks in an explicitly-interpretable manner. The fidelity and interpretability of the primitives' outputs enable an unparalleled ability to diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the resulting model. Critically, we show that these primitives are highly performant, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy of 99.1% on the CLEVR dataset. We also show that our model is able to effectively learn generalized representations when provided a small amount of data containing novel object attributes. Using the CoGenT generalization task, we show more than a 20 percentage point improvement over the current state of the art.

David Mascharka, Philip Tran, Ryan Soklaski, Arjun Majumdar
arXiv:1803.05268 · cs.CV · submitted Mar 14, 2018 · updated Jul 2, 2018
abstract · pdf · html · CVPR 2018 pre-print

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Sep 2018 (2 points, 1 comment) · Sep 2018 (1 point, 0 comments)

For a fairly accessible description of this work see [1]. As I understand it, they're addressing the problem of the internal functioning of DNNs being hard to interpret, by using composable NN modules.

[1] http://news.mit.edu/2018/mit-lincoln-laboratory-ai-system-so...