In plain words: It reads many papers in one field, maps how ideas connect, and guesses missing links to invent new ones, then writes each paper section from the last. In a blind expert test, its abstracts beat human-written ones up to 30% of the time.
Abstract
We present a PaperRobot who performs as an automatic research assistant by (1) conducting deep understanding of a large collection of human-written papers in a target domain and constructing comprehensive background knowledge graphs (KGs); (2) creating new ideas by predicting links from the background KGs, by combining graph attention and contextual text attention; (3) incrementally writing some key elements of a new paper based on memory-attention networks: from the input title along with predicted related entities to generate a paper abstract, from the abstract to generate conclusion and future work, and finally from future work to generate a title for a follow-on paper. Turing Tests, where a biomedical domain expert is asked to compare a system output and a human-authored string, show PaperRobot generated abstracts, conclusion and future work sections, and new titles are chosen over human-written ones up to 30%, 24% and 12% of the time, respectively.
Qingyun Wang, Lifu Huang, Zhiying Jiang, Kevin Knight, Heng Ji, Mohit Bansal, Yi Luan
arXiv:1905.07870 · cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.LG · submitted May 20, 2019 · updated May 31, 2019
abstract · pdf · html · 12 pages. Accepted by ACL 2019 Code and resource is available at https://github.com/EagleW/PaperRobot