about
Continual Learning for Robotics (arxiv.org)
1 point by sel1 on Jul 3, 2019 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: This review gathers work on learning new skills over time without forgetting old ones, and lays out a way to compare robot and non-robot studies. Most tests run in simulation or on fixed datasets, so they don't show whether methods help real robots.

Abstract · Continual Learning for Robotics: Definition, Framework, Learning Strategies, Opportunities and Challenges

Continual learning (CL) is a particular machine learning paradigm where the data distribution and learning objective changes through time, or where all the training data and objective criteria are never available at once. The evolution of the learning process is modeled by a sequence of learning experiences where the goal is to be able to learn new skills all along the sequence without forgetting what has been previously learned. Continual learning also aims at the same time at optimizing the memory, the computation power and the speed during the learning process. An important challenge for machine learning is not necessarily finding solutions that work in the real world but rather finding stable algorithms that can learn in real world. Hence, the ideal approach would be tackling the real world in a embodied platform: an autonomous agent. Continual learning would then be effective in an autonomous agent or robot, which would learn autonomously through time about the external world, and incrementally develop a set of complex skills and knowledge. Robotic agents have to learn to adapt and interact with their environment using a continuous stream of observations. Some recent approaches aim at tackling continual learning for robotics, but most recent papers on continual learning only experiment approaches in simulation or with static datasets. Unfortunately, the evaluation of those algorithms does not provide insights on whether their solutions may help continual learning in the context of robotics. This paper aims at reviewing the existing state of the art of continual learning, summarizing existing benchmarks and metrics, and proposing a framework for presenting and evaluating both robotics and non robotics approaches in a way that makes transfer between both fields easier.

Timothée Lesort, Vincenzo Lomonaco, Andrei Stoian, Davide Maltoni, David Filliat, Natalia Díaz-Rodríguez
arXiv:1907.00182 · cs.LG, cs.RO · submitted Jun 29, 2019 · updated Nov 22, 2019
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN