In plain words: The study surveys how AI systems across many fields, not just machine learning, explain their predictions in human terms, sorting them by how they build in explanations. It finds gaps remain for human-centered interpretability that truly helps the people using it.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence models are becoming increasingly more powerful and accurate, supporting or even replacing humans' decision making. But with increased power and accuracy also comes higher complexity, making it hard for users to understand how the model works and what the reasons behind its predictions are. Humans must explain and justify their decisions, and so do the AI models supporting them in this process, making semantic interpretability an emerging field of study. In this work, we look at interpretability from a broader point of view, going beyond the machine learning scope and covering different AI fields such as distributional semantics and fuzzy logic, among others. We examine and classify the models according to their nature and also based on how they introduce interpretability features, analyzing how each approach affects the final users and pointing to gaps that still need to be addressed to provide more human-centered interpretability solutions.
Vivian S. Silva, André Freitas, Siegfried Handschuh
arXiv:1907.04105 · cs.AI, cs.CL · submitted Jul 9, 2019
abstract · pdf · html · 17 pages, 4 figures. Submitted to AI Magazine on August, 2018