about
Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLP (arxiv.org)
2 points by nopinsight on Sep 4, 2019 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: They find short word sequences that, pasted onto any input, push a model toward one chosen answer, by testing which tokens most cut its errors. One such word alone cut sentence-inference accuracy from 89.94% to 0.55%, and the same words fooled other models too.

Abstract

Adversarial examples highlight model vulnerabilities and are useful for evaluation and interpretation. We define universal adversarial triggers: input-agnostic sequences of tokens that trigger a model to produce a specific prediction when concatenated to any input from a dataset. We propose a gradient-guided search over tokens which finds short trigger sequences (e.g., one word for classification and four words for language modeling) that successfully trigger the target prediction. For example, triggers cause SNLI entailment accuracy to drop from 89.94% to 0.55%, 72% of "why" questions in SQuAD to be answered "to kill american people", and the GPT-2 language model to spew racist output even when conditioned on non-racial contexts. Furthermore, although the triggers are optimized using white-box access to a specific model, they transfer to other models for all tasks we consider. Finally, since triggers are input-agnostic, they provide an analysis of global model behavior. For instance, they confirm that SNLI models exploit dataset biases and help to diagnose heuristics learned by reading comprehension models.

Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Nikhil Kandpal, Matt Gardner, Sameer Singh
arXiv:1908.07125 · cs.CL, cs.LG · submitted Aug 20, 2019 · updated Jan 3, 2021
abstract · pdf · html · EMNLP 2019

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Sep 2019 (2 points, 0 comments) · Aug 2019 (1 point, 0 comments)