about
LuNet: A Deep Neural Network for Network Intrusion Detection (arxiv.org)
2 points by sel1 on Sep 25, 2019 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: LuNet stacks pattern-spotting and sequence-tracking layers that study network traffic at ever finer detail, catching both local shapes and timing patterns to flag attacks. On two traffic datasets it kept detection high while raising far fewer false alarms than the best AI detectors.

Abstract

Network attack is a significant security issue for modern society. From small mobile devices to large cloud platforms, almost all computing products, used in our daily life, are networked and potentially under the threat of network intrusion. With the fast-growing network users, network intrusions become more and more frequent, volatile and advanced. Being able to capture intrusions in time for such a large scale network is critical and very challenging. To this end, the machine learning (or AI) based network intrusion detection (NID), due to its intelligent capability, has drawn increasing attention in recent years. Compared to the traditional signature-based approaches, the AI-based solutions are more capable of detecting variants of advanced network attacks. However, the high detection rate achieved by the existing designs is usually accompanied by a high rate of false alarms, which may significantly discount the overall effectiveness of the intrusion detection system. In this paper, we consider the existence of spatial and temporal features in the network traffic data and propose a hierarchical CNN+RNN neural network, LuNet. In LuNet, the convolutional neural network (CNN) and the recurrent neural network (RNN) learn input traffic data in sync with a gradually increasing granularity such that both spatial and temporal features of the data can be effectively extracted. Our experiments on two network traffic datasets show that compared to the state-of-the-art network intrusion detection techniques, LuNet not only offers a high level of detection capability but also has a much low rate of false positive-alarm.

Peilun Wu, Hui Guo
arXiv:1909.10031 · cs.AI · submitted Sep 22, 2019 · updated Oct 6, 2019
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN