about
Recurrent Neural Networks for Enhancement of Signature-Based NIDS (arxiv.org)
1 point by godelmachine on Sep 29, 2019 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: A neural network studies known attacks and creates new mutant versions plus new signatures, so an intrusion detector can be trained and tested on attacks it has never seen. On public traffic data, this raised a standard detector's catch rate by up to 16.67%.

Abstract · RNNIDS: Enhancing Network Intrusion Detection Systems through Deep Learning

Security of information passing through the Internet is threatened by today's most advanced malware ranging from orchestrated botnets to simpler polymorphic worms. These threats, as examples of zero-day attacks, are able to change their behavior several times in the early phases of their existence to bypass the network intrusion detection systems (NIDS). In fact, even well-designed, and frequently-updated signature-based NIDS cannot detect the zero-day treats due to the lack of an adequate signature database, adaptive to intelligent attacks on the Internet. More importantly, having an NIDS, it should be tested on malicious traffic dataset that not only represents known attacks, but also can to some extent reflect the characteristics of unknown, zero-day attacks. Generating such traffic is identified in the literature as one of the main obstacles for evaluating the effectiveness of NIDS. To address these issues, we introduce RNNIDS that applies Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to find complex patterns in attacks and generate similar ones. In this regard, for the first time, we demonstrate that RNNs are helpful to generate new, unseen mutants of attacks as well as synthetic signatures from the most advanced malware to improve the intrusion detection rate. Besides, to further enhance the design of an NIDS, RNNs can be employed to generate malicious datasets containing, e.g., unseen mutants of a malware. To evaluate the feasibility of our approaches, we conduct extensive experiments by incorporating publicly available datasets, where we show a considerable improvement in the detection rate of an off-the-shelf NIDS (up to 16.67%).

Soroush M. Sohi, Jean-Pierre Seifert, Fatemeh Ganji
arXiv:1807.03212 · cs.CR · submitted Jul 9, 2018 · updated Dec 21, 2020
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN