about
Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP (arxiv.org)
2 points by montalbano on Oct 4, 2019 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: It measures the money, electricity, and carbon pollution that go into training several successful language models. It finds these costs are substantial and recommends ways to cut them and make research more accessible.

Abstract

Recent progress in hardware and methodology for training neural networks has ushered in a new generation of large networks trained on abundant data. These models have obtained notable gains in accuracy across many NLP tasks. However, these accuracy improvements depend on the availability of exceptionally large computational resources that necessitate similarly substantial energy consumption. As a result these models are costly to train and develop, both financially, due to the cost of hardware and electricity or cloud compute time, and environmentally, due to the carbon footprint required to fuel modern tensor processing hardware. In this paper we bring this issue to the attention of NLP researchers by quantifying the approximate financial and environmental costs of training a variety of recently successful neural network models for NLP. Based on these findings, we propose actionable recommendations to reduce costs and improve equity in NLP research and practice.

Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, Andrew McCallum
arXiv:1906.02243 · cs.CL · submitted Jun 5, 2019
abstract · pdf · html · In the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). Florence, Italy. July 2019

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Jul 2019 (1 point, 0 comments) · Jun 2019 (1 point, 0 comments) · Jun 2019 (2 points, 0 comments)