In plain words: Estimating how much a treatment changes an outcome from observational data usually trains separate networks to predict the outcome and the chance of treatment, then combines them. Two tweaks—sharing the treatment-chance signal and nudging training toward statistically ideal behavior—beat usual two-stage setups.
Abstract
This paper addresses the use of neural networks for the estimation of treatment effects from observational data. Generally, estimation proceeds in two stages. First, we fit models for the expected outcome and the probability of treatment (propensity score) for each unit. Second, we plug these fitted models into a downstream estimator of the effect. Neural networks are a natural choice for the models in the first step. The question we address is: how can we adapt the design and training of the neural networks used in the first step in order to improve the quality of the final estimate of the treatment effect? We propose two adaptations based on insights from the statistical literature on the estimation of treatment effects. The first is a new architecture, the Dragonnet, that exploits the sufficiency of the propensity score for estimation adjustment. The second is a regularization procedure, targeted regularization, that induces a bias towards models that have non-parametrically optimal asymptotic properties `out-of-the-box`. Studies on benchmark datasets for causal inference show these adaptations outperform existing methods. Code is available at github.com/claudiashi57/dragonnet.
Claudia Shi, David M. Blei, Victor Veitch
arXiv:1906.02120 · stat.ML, cs.LG, stat.ME · submitted Jun 5, 2019 · updated Oct 17, 2019
abstract · pdf · html