In plain words: A selective survey maps the two-way exchange between machine learning and physics, covering how physics ideas sharpen learning tools and how learning is applied across particle physics, materials, and quantum science. It lays out wins, field-specific techniques, and open challenges in each area.
Abstract · Machine learning and the physical sciences
Machine learning encompasses a broad range of algorithms and modeling tools used for a vast array of data processing tasks, which has entered most scientific disciplines in recent years. We review in a selective way the recent research on the interface between machine learning and physical sciences. This includes conceptual developments in machine learning (ML) motivated by physical insights, applications of machine learning techniques to several domains in physics, and cross-fertilization between the two fields. After giving basic notion of machine learning methods and principles, we describe examples of how statistical physics is used to understand methods in ML. We then move to describe applications of ML methods in particle physics and cosmology, quantum many body physics, quantum computing, and chemical and material physics. We also highlight research and development into novel computing architectures aimed at accelerating ML. In each of the sections we describe recent successes as well as domain-specific methodology and challenges.
Giuseppe Carleo, Ignacio Cirac, Kyle Cranmer, Laurent Daudet, Maria Schuld, Naftali Tishby, Leslie Vogt-Maranto, Lenka Zdeborová
arXiv:1903.10563 · physics.comp-ph, astro-ph.CO, cond-mat.dis-nn, hep-th, quant-ph · submitted Mar 25, 2019 · updated Dec 6, 2019
abstract · pdf · html
That's an interesting thought. When Kepler was looking at planetary data and trying to make sense of it, he was doing pretty much what an ML algorithm does, searching his hypothesis space for the model that fits the data the best. Einstein feels like such a genius because his hypothesis space was enormous, he was able to search in very interesting and original axes. And ad-hoc hypotheses are discouraged because they overfit to the data, and thus are unlikely to generalize.