about
Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims (arxiv.org)
1 point by che_shr_cat on May 1, 2020 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: Computers must find abstracts that support or refute a scientific claim and point to the proving sentences, using 1,400 claims with labeled evidence. Models tuned on scientific writing beat ones trained on Wikipedia or news, and the system checked COVID-19 claims against a paper collection.

Abstract

We introduce scientific claim verification, a new task to select abstracts from the research literature containing evidence that SUPPORTS or REFUTES a given scientific claim, and to identify rationales justifying each decision. To study this task, we construct SciFact, a dataset of 1.4K expert-written scientific claims paired with evidence-containing abstracts annotated with labels and rationales. We develop baseline models for SciFact, and demonstrate that simple domain adaptation techniques substantially improve performance compared to models trained on Wikipedia or political news. We show that our system is able to verify claims related to COVID-19 by identifying evidence from the CORD-19 corpus. Our experiments indicate that SciFact will provide a challenging testbed for the development of new systems designed to retrieve and reason over corpora containing specialized domain knowledge. Data and code for this new task are publicly available at https://github.com/allenai/scifact. A leaderboard and COVID-19 fact-checking demo are available at https://scifact.apps.allenai.org.

David Wadden, Shanchuan Lin, Kyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Madeleine van Zuylen, Arman Cohan, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
arXiv:2004.14974 · cs.CL · submitted Apr 30, 2020 · updated Oct 3, 2020
abstract · pdf · html · EMNLP 2020. GitHub: https://github.com/allenai/scifact. Leaderboard and demo: https://scifact.apps.allenai.org

add comment on HN