In plain words: Some CIFAR test images are exact copies of training photos, so models can score well by memorizing. Replacing those copies with fresh images cut accuracy 9% to 14% relative to the original test set across popular image-recognition networks.
Abstract · Do We Train on Test Data? Purging CIFAR of Near-Duplicates
The CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets are two of the most heavily benchmarked datasets in computer vision and are often used to evaluate novel methods and model architectures in the field of deep learning. However, we find that 3.3% and 10% of the images from the test sets of these datasets have duplicates in the training set. These duplicates are easily recognizable by memorization and may, hence, bias the comparison of image recognition techniques regarding their generalization capability. To eliminate this bias, we provide the "fair CIFAR" (ciFAIR) dataset, where we replaced all duplicates in the test sets with new images sampled from the same domain. We then re-evaluate the classification performance of various popular state-of-the-art CNN architectures on these new test sets to investigate whether recent research has overfitted to memorizing data instead of learning abstract concepts. We find a significant drop in classification accuracy of between 9% and 14% relative to the original performance on the duplicate-free test set. The ciFAIR dataset and pre-trained models are available at https://cvjena.github.io/cifair/, where we also maintain a leaderboard.
Björn Barz, Joachim Denzler
arXiv:1902.00423 · cs.CV · submitted Feb 1, 2019 · updated Jun 2, 2020
abstract · pdf · html · Journal of Imaging