In plain words: A new test asks language models to judge everyday text scenarios on justice, well-being, duties, virtues, and common-sense right and wrong, matching what most people would say. Current models get the basics partly right but still miss many moral judgments.
Abstract · Aligning AI With Shared Human Values
We show how to assess a language model's knowledge of basic concepts of morality. We introduce the ETHICS dataset, a new benchmark that spans concepts in justice, well-being, duties, virtues, and commonsense morality. Models predict widespread moral judgments about diverse text scenarios. This requires connecting physical and social world knowledge to value judgements, a capability that may enable us to steer chatbot outputs or eventually regularize open-ended reinforcement learning agents. With the ETHICS dataset, we find that current language models have a promising but incomplete ability to predict basic human ethical judgements. Our work shows that progress can be made on machine ethics today, and it provides a steppingstone toward AI that is aligned with human values.
Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch, Jerry Li, Dawn Song, Jacob Steinhardt
arXiv:2008.02275 · cs.CY, cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.LG · submitted Aug 5, 2020 · updated Feb 17, 2023
abstract · pdf · html · ICLR 2021; the ETHICS dataset is available at https://github.com/hendrycks/ethics/