about
Automatic Speech Recognition in Sanskrit: Speech Corpus and Modelling Insights (arxiv.org)
1 point by 5rest on Sep 16, 2021 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: A 78-hour Sanskrit speech collection lets us test which sound and text chunks work best for writing down speech, including a new vowel-to-vowel chunk. Writing words as they sound rather than in the native script reduced errors, and it helped Gujarati and Telugu too.

Abstract · Automatic Speech Recognition in Sanskrit: A New Speech Corpus and Modelling Insights

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) in Sanskrit is interesting, owing to the various linguistic peculiarities present in the language. The Sanskrit language is lexically productive, undergoes euphonic assimilation of phones at the word boundaries and exhibits variations in spelling conventions and in pronunciations. In this work, we propose the first large scale study of automatic speech recognition (ASR) in Sanskrit, with an emphasis on the impact of unit selection in Sanskrit ASR. In this work, we release a 78 hour ASR dataset for Sanskrit, which faithfully captures several of the linguistic characteristics expressed by the language. We investigate the role of different acoustic model and language model units in ASR systems for Sanskrit. We also propose a new modelling unit, inspired by the syllable level unit selection, that captures character sequences from one vowel in the word to the next vowel. We also highlight the importance of choosing graphemic representations for Sanskrit and show the impact of this choice on word error rates (WER). Finally, we extend these insights from Sanskrit ASR for building ASR systems in two other Indic languages, Gujarati and Telugu. For both these languages, our experimental results show that the use of phonetic based graphemic representations in ASR results in performance improvements as compared to ASR systems that use native scripts.

Devaraja Adiga, Rishabh Kumar, Amrith Krishna, Preethi Jyothi, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Pawan Goyal
arXiv:2106.05852 · eess.AS, cs.CL, cs.LG, cs.SD · submitted Jun 2, 2021 · updated Jul 23, 2021
abstract · pdf · Accepted paper at the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2021 Findings)

add comment on HN