about
A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systems (arxiv.org)
3 points by PaulHoule on Jun 9, 2022 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: This survey gathers over 60 papers on whether recommender systems treat users and providers fairly, sorting the many competing fairness definitions into a few clear viewpoints. It also organizes the datasets, measures, and solutions into one taxonomy, since the field's ideas were previously scattered.

Abstract

Recommender systems are an essential tool to relieve the information overload challenge and play an important role in people's daily lives. Since recommendations involve allocations of social resources (e.g., job recommendation), an important issue is whether recommendations are fair. Unfair recommendations are not only unethical but also harm the long-term interests of the recommender system itself. As a result, fairness issues in recommender systems have recently attracted increasing attention. However, due to multiple complex resource allocation processes and various fairness definitions, the research on fairness in recommendation is scattered. To fill this gap, we review over 60 papers published in top conferences/journals, including TOIS, SIGIR, and WWW. First, we summarize fairness definitions in the recommendation and provide several views to classify fairness issues. Then, we review recommendation datasets and measurements in fairness studies and provide an elaborate taxonomy of fairness methods in the recommendation. Finally, we conclude this survey by outlining some promising future directions.

Yifan Wang, Weizhi Ma, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, Shaoping Ma
arXiv:2206.03761 · cs.IR · submitted Jun 8, 2022 · updated Jun 19, 2022
abstract · pdf · html · Submitted to the Special Section on Trustworthy Recommendation and Search of ACM TOIS on March 27, 2022 and accepted on June 6

add comment on HN