about
DALL-E 2 Fails to Reliably Capture Common Syntactic Processes (arxiv.org)
3 points by _4bjt on Oct 25, 2022 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: They tested whether DALL-E 2 turns sentence grammar into the right picture, using 8 everyday rules like word order, passives, and negation. It often got the meaning wrong, while young children handle these rules easily.

Abstract

Machine intelligence is increasingly being linked to claims about sentience, language processing, and an ability to comprehend and transform natural language into a range of stimuli. We systematically analyze the ability of DALL-E 2 to capture 8 grammatical phenomena pertaining to compositionality that are widely discussed in linguistics and pervasive in human language: binding principles and coreference, passives, word order, coordination, comparatives, negation, ellipsis, and structural ambiguity. Whereas young children routinely master these phenomena, learning systematic mappings between syntax and semantics, DALL-E 2 is unable to reliably infer meanings that are consistent with the syntax. These results challenge recent claims concerning the capacity of such systems to understand of human language. We make available the full set of test materials as a benchmark for future testing.

Evelina Leivada, Elliot Murphy, Gary Marcus
arXiv:2210.12889 · cs.CL, cs.CV · submitted Oct 23, 2022 · updated Oct 25, 2022
abstract · pdf

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Oct 2022 (2 points, 0 comments)