about
Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries (2019) (arxiv.org)
1 point by tosh on Dec 8, 2022 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: Instead of scoring summaries by word overlap with a human-written reference, this system learns a scorer from human ratings of 2,500 summaries, judging each against just its document. Summaries trained with it earned higher human ratings than overlap-scored or standard supervised training.

Abstract · Better Rewards Yield Better Summaries: Learning to Summarise Without References

Reinforcement Learning (RL) based document summarisation systems yield state-of-the-art performance in terms of ROUGE scores, because they directly use ROUGE as the rewards during training. However, summaries with high ROUGE scores often receive low human judgement. To find a better reward function that can guide RL to generate human-appealing summaries, we learn a reward function from human ratings on 2,500 summaries. Our reward function only takes the document and system summary as input. Hence, once trained, it can be used to train RL-based summarisation systems without using any reference summaries. We show that our learned rewards have significantly higher correlation with human ratings than previous approaches. Human evaluation experiments show that, compared to the state-of-the-art supervised-learning systems and ROUGE-as-rewards RL summarisation systems, the RL systems using our learned rewards during training generate summarieswith higher human ratings. The learned reward function and our source code are available at https://github.com/yg211/summary-reward-no-reference.

Florian Böhm, Yang Gao, Christian M. Meyer, Ori Shapira, Ido Dagan, Iryna Gurevych
arXiv:1909.01214 · cs.CL · submitted Sep 3, 2019
abstract · pdf · html · Accepted to EMNLP2019

add comment on HN