In plain words: A chess engine works out what is happening on the board, then a language model turns those findings into natural commentary it can steer. Human judges preferred these write-ups over ones made by earlier systems.
Abstract · Improving Chess Commentaries by Combining Language Models with Symbolic Reasoning Engines
Despite many recent advancements in language modeling, state-of-the-art language models lack grounding in the real world and struggle with tasks involving complex reasoning. Meanwhile, advances in the symbolic reasoning capabilities of AI have led to systems that outperform humans in games like chess and Go (Silver et al., 2018). Chess commentary provides an interesting domain for bridging these two fields of research, as it requires reasoning over a complex board state and providing analyses in natural language. In this work we demonstrate how to combine symbolic reasoning engines with controllable language models to generate chess commentaries. We conduct experiments to demonstrate that our approach generates commentaries that are preferred by human judges over previous baselines.
Andrew Lee, David Wu, Emily Dinan, Mike Lewis
arXiv:2212.08195 · cs.CL · submitted Dec 15, 2022
abstract · pdf · html