about
Augmented Language Models: A Survey (arxiv.org)
2 points by anigbrowl on Feb 17, 2023 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: This survey collects studies that let language models split hard tasks into steps and call outside tools like a code interpreter. Such models still predict missing words but beat most plain models on several benchmarks, and may fix poor interpretability and consistency.

Abstract · Augmented Language Models: a Survey

This survey reviews works in which language models (LMs) are augmented with reasoning skills and the ability to use tools. The former is defined as decomposing a potentially complex task into simpler subtasks while the latter consists in calling external modules such as a code interpreter. LMs can leverage these augmentations separately or in combination via heuristics, or learn to do so from demonstrations. While adhering to a standard missing tokens prediction objective, such augmented LMs can use various, possibly non-parametric external modules to expand their context processing ability, thus departing from the pure language modeling paradigm. We therefore refer to them as Augmented Language Models (ALMs). The missing token objective allows ALMs to learn to reason, use tools, and even act, while still performing standard natural language tasks and even outperforming most regular LMs on several benchmarks. In this work, after reviewing current advance in ALMs, we conclude that this new research direction has the potential to address common limitations of traditional LMs such as interpretability, consistency, and scalability issues.

Grégoire Mialon, Roberto Dessì, Maria Lomeli, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Ram Pasunuru, Roberta Raileanu, Baptiste Rozière, Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Asli Celikyilmaz, Edouard Grave, Yann LeCun, et al.
arXiv:2302.07842 · cs.CL · submitted Feb 15, 2023
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN