In plain words: A plan for testing AI systems: check what dangerous things a model can do, like cyberattacks or manipulation, and whether it is willing to use them to cause harm. These two checks guide training, release, and security decisions and keep officials informed.
Abstract · Model evaluation for extreme risks
Current approaches to building general-purpose AI systems tend to produce systems with both beneficial and harmful capabilities. Further progress in AI development could lead to capabilities that pose extreme risks, such as offensive cyber capabilities or strong manipulation skills. We explain why model evaluation is critical for addressing extreme risks. Developers must be able to identify dangerous capabilities (through "dangerous capability evaluations") and the propensity of models to apply their capabilities for harm (through "alignment evaluations"). These evaluations will become critical for keeping policymakers and other stakeholders informed, and for making responsible decisions about model training, deployment, and security.
Toby Shevlane, Sebastian Farquhar, Ben Garfinkel, Mary Phuong, Jess Whittlestone, Jade Leung, Daniel Kokotajlo, Nahema Marchal, Markus Anderljung, Noam Kolt, Lewis Ho, Divya Siddarth, et al.
arXiv:2305.15324 · cs.AI · submitted May 24, 2023 · updated Sep 22, 2023
abstract · pdf · html · Fixed typos; added citation