In plain words: This survey reviews how new systems like Gemini and the rumored Q* are shifting generative AI toward combining many small specialist networks and mixing text, images, and other inputs. It finds research priorities moving toward healthcare, finance, and education, while a flood of AI papers strains peer review and ethics must guide development.
Abstract · From Google Gemini to OpenAI Q* (Q-Star): A Survey of Reshaping the Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research Landscape
This comprehensive survey explored the evolving landscape of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), with a specific focus on the transformative impacts of Mixture of Experts (MoE), multimodal learning, and the speculated advancements towards Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). It critically examined the current state and future trajectory of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), exploring how innovations like Google's Gemini and the anticipated OpenAI Q* project are reshaping research priorities and applications across various domains, including an impact analysis on the generative AI research taxonomy. It assessed the computational challenges, scalability, and real-world implications of these technologies while highlighting their potential in driving significant progress in fields like healthcare, finance, and education. It also addressed the emerging academic challenges posed by the proliferation of both AI-themed and AI-generated preprints, examining their impact on the peer-review process and scholarly communication. The study highlighted the importance of incorporating ethical and human-centric methods in AI development, ensuring alignment with societal norms and welfare, and outlined a strategy for future AI research that focuses on a balanced and conscientious use of MoE, multimodality, and AGI in generative AI.
Timothy R. McIntosh, Teo Susnjak, Tong Liu, Paul Watters, Malka N. Halgamuge
arXiv:2312.10868 · cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.CY, cs.HC · submitted Dec 18, 2023
abstract · pdf · html · 30 pages