about
Rebus: A Robust Evaluation Benchmark of Understanding Symbols (arxiv.org)
1 point by ag8 on Jan 26, 2024 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: A new test uses 333 rebus puzzles—picture wordplay that clues a word or phrase—to check whether AI models can combine image reading, letter tricks, and multi-step reasoning. The best model solved just 42% overall and only 7% of the hardest ones.

Abstract · REBUS: A Robust Evaluation Benchmark of Understanding Symbols

We propose a new benchmark evaluating the performance of multimodal large language models on rebus puzzles. The dataset covers 333 original examples of image-based wordplay, cluing 13 categories such as movies, composers, major cities, and food. To achieve good performance on the benchmark of identifying the clued word or phrase, models must combine image recognition and string manipulation with hypothesis testing, multi-step reasoning, and an understanding of human cognition, making for a complex, multimodal evaluation of capabilities. We find that GPT-4o significantly outperforms all other models, followed by proprietary models outperforming all other evaluated models. However, even the best model has a final accuracy of only 42\%, which goes down to just 7\% on hard puzzles, highlighting the need for substantial improvements in reasoning. Further, models rarely understand all parts of a puzzle, and are almost always incapable of retroactively explaining the correct answer. Our benchmark can therefore be used to identify major shortcomings in the knowledge and reasoning of multimodal large language models.

Andrew Gritsevskiy, Arjun Panickssery, Aaron Kirtland, Derik Kauffman, Hans Gundlach, Irina Gritsevskaya, Joe Cavanagh, Jonathan Chiang, Lydia La Roux, Michelle Hung
arXiv:2401.05604 · cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.CY · submitted Jan 11, 2024 · updated Jun 3, 2024
abstract · pdf · html · 20 pages, 5 figures. For code, see http://github.com/cvndsh/rebus

add comment on HN