about
Large Language Models for Data Annotation: A Survey (arxiv.org)
2 points by veryluckyxyz on May 4, 2024 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: Labeling or creating training data by hand is slow and costly, so this survey gathers how big language models can do it instead. It organizes the field into making labels, checking their quality, and using them, and notes where the approach still falls short.

Abstract · Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey

Data annotation and synthesis generally refers to the labeling or generating of raw data with relevant information, which could be used for improving the efficacy of machine learning models. The process, however, is labor-intensive and costly. The emergence of advanced Large Language Models (LLMs), exemplified by GPT-4, presents an unprecedented opportunity to automate the complicated process of data annotation and synthesis. While existing surveys have extensively covered LLM architecture, training, and general applications, we uniquely focus on their specific utility for data annotation. This survey contributes to three core aspects: LLM-Based Annotation Generation, LLM-Generated Annotations Assessment, and LLM-Generated Annotations Utilization. Furthermore, this survey includes an in-depth taxonomy of data types that LLMs can annotate, a comprehensive review of learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations, and a detailed discussion of the primary challenges and limitations associated with using LLMs for data annotation and synthesis. Serving as a key guide, this survey aims to assist researchers and practitioners in exploring the potential of the latest LLMs for data annotation, thereby fostering future advancements in this critical field.

Zhen Tan, Dawei Li, Song Wang, Alimohammad Beigi, Bohan Jiang, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Mansooreh Karami, Jundong Li, Lu Cheng, Huan Liu
arXiv:2402.13446 · cs.CL · submitted Feb 21, 2024 · updated Dec 2, 2024
abstract · pdf · html · Accepted to EMNLP 2024 Main

add comment on HN