about
Irrelevant Alternatives Bias Large Language Model Hiring Decisions (arxiv.org)
3 points by PaulHoule on Oct 6, 2024 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: They tested whether AI recruiters fall for the attraction effect: adding a clearly worse candidate makes a rival look better and get picked more often. Both chatbots showed the bias, which grew when the decoy's gender was named; warnings did not stop it.

Abstract

We investigate whether LLMs display a well-known human cognitive bias, the attraction effect, in hiring decisions. The attraction effect occurs when the presence of an inferior candidate makes a superior candidate more appealing, increasing the likelihood of the superior candidate being chosen over a non-dominated competitor. Our study finds consistent and significant evidence of the attraction effect in GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 when they assume the role of a recruiter. Irrelevant attributes of the decoy, such as its gender, further amplify the observed bias. GPT-4 exhibits greater bias variation than GPT-3.5. Our findings remain robust even when warnings against the decoy effect are included and the recruiter role definition is varied.

Kremena Valkanova, Pencho Yordanov
arXiv:2409.15299 · cs.CY, cs.AI, cs.HC · submitted Sep 4, 2024
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN