In plain words: Groups of AI chatbots playing a naming game settled on the same shared rule without anyone programming it. The group could end up biased even when each chatbot was unbiased, and a stubborn minority could push everyone to a new rule.
Abstract · Emergent social conventions and collective bias in LLM populations
Social conventions are the backbone of social coordination, shaping how individuals form a group. As growing populations of artificial intelligence (AI) agents communicate through natural language, a fundamental question is whether they can bootstrap the foundations of a society. Here, we present experimental results that demonstrate the spontaneous emergence of universally adopted social conventions in decentralized populations of large language model (LLM) agents. We then show how strong collective biases can emerge during this process, even when agents exhibit no bias individually. Last, we examine how committed minority groups of adversarial LLM agents can drive social change by imposing alternative social conventions on the larger population. Our results show that AI systems can autonomously develop social conventions without explicit programming and have implications for designing AI systems that align, and remain aligned, with human values and societal goals.
Ariel Flint Ashery, Luca Maria Aiello, Andrea Baronchelli
arXiv:2410.08948 · cs.MA, cs.AI, cs.CY, physics.soc-ph · submitted Oct 11, 2024 · updated May 29, 2025
abstract · pdf · html