about
Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey (arxiv.org)
3 points by nickpsecurity on Nov 29, 2024 | hide | past | pdf | 1 comment on HN

In plain words: This survey collects ways to teach models the physical laws behind their data, keeping predictions physically sensible. It sorts the field by task, by how physics is encoded, and how it is added, yet building physics into model design, training, and robot control is unexplored.

Abstract · Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applications

Recent advances of data-driven machine learning have revolutionized fields like computer vision, reinforcement learning, and many scientific and engineering domains. In many real-world and scientific problems, systems that generate data are governed by physical laws. Recent work shows that it provides potential benefits for machine learning models by incorporating the physical prior and collected data, which makes the intersection of machine learning and physics become a prevailing paradigm. By integrating the data and mathematical physics models seamlessly, it can guide the machine learning model towards solutions that are physically plausible, improving accuracy and efficiency even in uncertain and high-dimensional contexts. In this survey, we present this learning paradigm called Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) which is to build a model that leverages empirical data and available physical prior knowledge to improve performance on a set of tasks that involve a physical mechanism. We systematically review the recent development of physics-informed machine learning from three perspectives of machine learning tasks, representation of physical prior, and methods for incorporating physical prior. We also propose several important open research problems based on the current trends in the field. We argue that encoding different forms of physical prior into model architectures, optimizers, inference algorithms, and significant domain-specific applications like inverse engineering design and robotic control is far from being fully explored in the field of physics-informed machine learning. We believe that the interdisciplinary research of physics-informed machine learning will significantly propel research progress, foster the creation of more effective machine learning models, and also offer invaluable assistance in addressing long-standing problems in related disciplines.

Zhongkai Hao, Songming Liu, Yichi Zhang, Chengyang Ying, Yao Feng, Hang Su, Jun Zhu
arXiv:2211.08064 · cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CV, math.NA · submitted Nov 15, 2022 · updated Mar 7, 2023
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN

"Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applications" (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08064 :

> We systematically review the recent development of physics-informed machine learning from three perspectives of machine learning tasks, representation of physical prior, and methods for incorporating physical prior. We also propose several important open research problems based on the current trends in the field. We argue that encoding different forms of physical prior into model architectures, optimizers, inference algorithms, and significant domain-specific applications like inverse engineering design and robotic control is far from being fully explored in the field of physics-informed machine learning. We believe that the interdisciplinary research of physics-informed machine learning will significantly propel research progress, foster the creation of more effective machine learning models, and also offer invaluable assistance in addressing long-standing problems in related disciplines.

Re: LLM ml benchmarks; FrontierMath (only 2% of tasks in 2024), TheoremQA: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42097683