In plain words: Several AI agents take turns proposing, criticizing, and improving research hypotheses in a competition, with more computing time steadily sharpening the ideas. Lab tests confirmed new uses for existing drugs and drug combinations against acute myeloid leukemia.
Abstract · Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientist
Scientific discovery is driven by scientists generating novel hypotheses for complex problems that undergo rigorous experimental validation. To augment this process, we introduce Co-Scientist, a multi-agent AI system built on Gemini for structured scientific thinking and hypothesis generation. Co-Scientist aims to help scientists discover new original knowledge. Conditioned on their research objectives and prior scientific evidence, it formulates demonstrably novel research hypotheses for experimental verification. The system's design involves agents continuously generating, critiquing and refining hypotheses accelerated by scaling test-time compute. Key contributions include: (1) a multi-agent architecture with an asynchronous task execution framework for flexible compute scaling; (2) a tournament evolution process for self-improving hypotheses generation. Automated evaluations show continued benefits of test-time compute scaling, improving hypothesis quality over time. While general purpose, we focus the validation in three biomedical applications: drug repurposing, novel target discovery, and explaining mechanisms of anti-microbial resistance. Specifically, Co-Scientist helped identify new drug repurposing candidates and synergistic combination therapies for acute myeloid leukemia, which were validated through in vitro experiments. These real-world validations demonstrate the potential of Co-Scientist to accelerate scientific discovery and usher in an era of AI empowered scientists.
Juraj Gottweis, Wei-Hung Weng, Alexander Daryin, Tao Tu, Petar Sirkovic, Artiom Myaskovsky, Grzegorz Glowaty, Felix Weissenberger, Alessio Orlandi, Dan Popovici, Anil Palepu, Keran Rong, et al.
arXiv:2502.18864 · cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.HC, cs.LG, physics.soc-ph, q-bio.OT · submitted Feb 26, 2025 · updated Jun 29, 2026
abstract · pdf · 157 pages in total (main 42 pages, supplementary information 115 pages), 4 main figures, 1 main table, 6 extended data figures, 2 extended data tables, 9 supplementary figures, 4 supplementary tables, 37 main references, 117 supplementary references. Nature (2026)
Most grad students and professors can cook up reasonable hypotheses, but someone still has to run all of the experiments. The phase space is generally too wide to explore all research directions so human intuition is still needed to figure out what will pan out so the students are fed and the next grant comes in.