In plain words: They built a set of picture-and-question pairs showing analog clocks and yearly calendars, asking things like reading the time or finding the 100th day of the year. The best image-reading AI systems still get many wrong, showing they can't reliably tell time from pictures.
Abstract · Lost in Time: Clock and Calendar Understanding Challenges in Multimodal LLMs
Understanding time from visual representations is a fundamental cognitive skill, yet it remains a challenge for multimodal large language models (MLLMs). In this work, we investigate the capabilities of MLLMs in interpreting time and date through analogue clocks and yearly calendars. To facilitate this, we curated a structured dataset comprising two subsets: 1) $\textit{ClockQA}$, which comprises various types of clock styles$-$standard, black-dial, no-second-hand, Roman numeral, and arrow-hand clocks$-$paired with time related questions; and 2) $\textit{CalendarQA}$, which consists of yearly calendar images with questions ranging from commonly known dates (e.g., Christmas, New Year's Day) to computationally derived ones (e.g., the 100th or 153rd day of the year). We aim to analyse how MLLMs can perform visual recognition, numerical reasoning, and temporal inference when presented with time-related visual data. Our evaluations show that despite recent advancements, reliably understanding time remains a significant challenge for MLLMs.
Rohit Saxena, Aryo Pradipta Gema, Pasquale Minervini
arXiv:2502.05092 · cs.CV, cs.AI, cs.CL · submitted Feb 7, 2025 · updated Mar 18, 2025
abstract · pdf · html · Accepted at the ICLR 2025 Workshop on Reasoning and Planning for Large Language Models