Several studies claim that large language models have passed the Turing Test and hence can "think", yet none follow Turing's original instructions precisely. Passing the test holds significance as evidence that a machine demonstrates human-like intelligence, and as a marker for artificial-general intelligence in commercial and legal domains. We conducted Turing's three-player imitation game with an LLM by following the guidelines identified by Turing and applying scientific standards wherever detailed instructions were missing. We performed a computer-imitates-human game without duration constraints and a man-imitates-woman game as a benchmark. In the computer-imitates-human game, only one participant misidentified the large language model, indicating that claims of large language models' passing the Turing test are premature. Participants required over five minutes for both tasks, with the man-imitates-woman game taking longer; shorter time limits elsewhere may explain earlier positive results. We expect the Turing Test to remain central in assessing machine intelligence for years to come.