about
Pushing the Limits of LLM Quantization via the Linearity Theorem (arxiv.org)
95 points by felineflock on Apr 20, 2025 | hide | past | pdf | 2 comments on HN

In plain words: A proof shows that the squared error from rounding a model's numbers layer by layer directly predicts how much more confused the model gets. Using it, a new no-training compression scheme beats the popular NF4 format at the same size.

Abstract · Pushing the Limits of Large Language Model Quantization via the Linearity Theorem

Quantizing large language models has become a standard way to reduce their memory and computational costs. Typically, existing methods focus on breaking down the problem into individual layer-wise sub-problems, and minimizing per-layer error, measured via various metrics. Yet, this approach currently lacks theoretical justification and the metrics employed may be sub-optimal. In this paper, we present a "linearity theorem" establishing a direct relationship between the layer-wise $\ell_2$ reconstruction error and the model perplexity increase due to quantization. This insight enables two novel applications: (1) a simple data-free LLM quantization method using Hadamard rotations and MSE-optimal grids, dubbed HIGGS, which outperforms all prior data-free approaches such as the extremely popular NF4 quantized format, and (2) an optimal solution to the problem of finding non-uniform per-layer quantization levels which match a given compression constraint in the medium-bitwidth regime, obtained by reduction to dynamic programming. On the practical side, we demonstrate improved accuracy-compression trade-offs on Llama-3.1 and 3.2-family models, as well as on Qwen-family models. Further, we show that our method can be efficiently supported in terms of GPU kernels at various batch sizes, advancing both data-free and non-uniform quantization for LLMs.

Vladimir Malinovskii, Andrei Panferov, Ivan Ilin, Han Guo, Peter Richtárik, Dan Alistarh
arXiv:2411.17525 · cs.LG · submitted Nov 26, 2024
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN

The OP looks like good work, but it's definitely not a quick read. The authors claim theoretical breakthroughs that enable:

* a data-free LLM quantization method which they claim outperforms all prior data-free approaches, including NF4; and

* a method which they claim is optimal for finding non-uniform per-layer quantization levels which match a given compression constraint in the "medium bitwidth" regime.

They demonstrate improved accuracy-compression trade-offs on popular LLMs.

Thank you for sharing this on HN.

Given our modern understanding of how LLMs work (like the recent Anthropic work), I wonder if that insight can be used to quantize better. For example, we know that LLMs encode concepts through rotations (but not magnitude) of several neurons.

Bringing this up because the abstract (and the mention of rotations) reminded me of recent LLM interpretability posts.