about
Unsupervised Elicitation of Language Models (arxiv.org)
7 points by xianshou on Jun 13, 2025 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: Instead of learning from human-labeled examples, this approach fine-tunes a model on labels it generates itself, keeping the ones that make its own answers most consistent. It matched training on correct labels and beat training on crowd labels, especially where the model outperforms people.

Abstract

To steer pretrained language models for downstream tasks, today's post-training paradigm relies on humans to specify desired behaviors. However, for models with superhuman capabilities, it is difficult or impossible to get high-quality human supervision. To address this challenge, we introduce a new unsupervised algorithm, Internal Coherence Maximization (ICM), to fine-tune pretrained language models on their own generated labels, \emph{without external supervision}. On GSM8k-verification, TruthfulQA, and Alpaca reward modeling tasks, our method matches the performance of training on golden labels and outperforms training on crowdsourced human supervision. On tasks where LMs' capabilities are strongly superhuman, our method can elicit those capabilities significantly better than training on human labels. Finally, we show that our method can improve the training of frontier LMs: we use our method to train an unsupervised reward model and use reinforcement learning to train a Claude 4 Sonnet-based assistant. The resulting assistant matches its counterpart trained on production-grade human labels on average, with higher scores on chat and safety yet lower scores on math and coding.

Jiaxin Wen, Zachary Ankner, Arushi Somani, Peter Hase, Samuel Marks, Jacob Goldman-Wetzler, Linda Petrini, Henry Sleight, Collin Burns, He He, Shi Feng, Ethan Perez, et al.
arXiv:2506.10139 · cs.CL, cs.AI · submitted Jun 11, 2025 · updated Jan 26, 2026
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Jun 2025 (135 points, 24 comments)