about
Gemini 2.5 Pro Capable of Winning Gold at IMO 2025 (arxiv.org)
4 points by __rito__ on Jul 22, 2025 | hide | past | pdf | discuss on HN

In plain words: A set of prompts makes any top AI model check its own math answers and fix mistakes before submitting. On six fresh IMO 2025 problems it solved five, versus under two in five when the same models just picked their best of 32 tries.

Abstract · Winning Gold at IMO 2025 with a Model-Agnostic Verification-and-Refinement Pipeline

The International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is widely regarded as the world championship of high-school mathematics. IMO problems are renowned for their difficulty and novelty, demanding deep insight, creativity, and rigor. Although large language models perform well on many mathematical benchmarks, they often struggle with Olympiad-level problems. Using carefully designed prompts, we construct a model-agnostic, verification-and-refinement pipeline. We demonstrate its effectiveness on the recent IMO 2025, avoiding data contamination for models released before the competition. Equipped with any of the three leading models -- Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok-4, or GPT-5 -- our pipeline correctly solved 5 out of the 6 problems ($\approx$85.7% accuracy). This is in sharp contrast to their baseline accuracies: 31.6% (Gemini 2.5 Pro), 21.4% (Grok-4), and 38.1% (GPT-5), obtained by selecting the best of 32 candidate solutions. The substantial improvement underscores that the path to advanced AI reasoning requires not only developing more powerful base models but also designing effective methodologies to harness their full potential for complex tasks.

Yichen Huang, Lin F. Yang
arXiv:2507.15855 · cs.AI · submitted Jul 21, 2025 · updated Sep 30, 2025
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Jul 2025 (1 point, 1 comment) · Jul 2025 (4 points, 3 comments)