about
WhoFi: Deep Person Re-Identification via Wi-Fi Channel Signal Encoding (arxiv.org)
55 points by wut42 on Jul 25, 2025 | hide | past | pdf | 10 comments on HN

In plain words: Instead of cameras, this system reads how a person distorts Wi-Fi signals and turns those patterns into a signature for recognizing them again later. In tests it performed about as well as the best existing methods.

Abstract

Person Re-Identification is a key and challenging task in video surveillance. While traditional methods rely on visual data, issues like poor lighting, occlusion, and suboptimal angles often hinder performance. To address these challenges, we introduce WhoFi, a novel pipeline that utilizes Wi-Fi signals for person re-identification. Biometric features are extracted from Channel State Information (CSI) and processed through a modular Deep Neural Network (DNN) featuring a Transformer-based encoder. The network is trained using an in-batch negative loss function to learn robust and generalizable biometric signatures. Experiments on the NTU-Fi dataset show that our approach achieves competitive results compared to state-of-the-art methods, confirming its effectiveness in identifying individuals via Wi-Fi signals.

Danilo Avola, Emad Emam, Dario Montagnini, Daniele Pannone, Amedeo Ranaldi
arXiv:2507.12869 · cs.CV, cs.LG · submitted Jul 17, 2025 · updated Aug 4, 2025
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Jul 2025 (4 points, 0 comments) · Jul 2025 (1 point, 0 comments)

"Xfinity using WiFi signals in your house to detect motion" (2025), 500 comments, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44426726

"How Wi-Fi sensing became usable tech" (2024), https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/02/27/1088154/wifi-sen...

  There is one area that the IEEE is not working on, at least not directly: privacy and security.. IEEE fellow and member of the Wi-Fi sensing task group.. the goal is to focus on “at least get the sensing measurements done.” He says that the committee did discuss privacy and security: “Some individuals have raised concerns, including myself.” But they decided that while those concerns do need to be addressed, they are not within the committee’s mandate.
2021 privacy comments on Wi-Fi 7 standards work for IEEE 802.11bf, https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.14918.pdf

> it has been shown that SENS-based classifiers can infer privacy-critical information such as keyboard typing, gesture recognition and activity tracking ... since Wi-Fi signals can penetrate hard objects and can be used without the presence of light, end-users may not even realize they are being tracked ... individuals should be provided the opportunity to opt out of SENS services – in other words, to avoid being monitored and tracked by the Wi-Fi devices around them. This would require the widespread introduction of reliable SENS algorithm for human or animal identification.

Would this require a worldwide database of biometric signatures for each human that opts out?

Of course, which is why we shouldn't have ever accepted any industry having the option to implement opt-out regimes.

Of course advertising kinda screwed us in that regard.

Release papers to show Chinese we also have this idiotic technology...then crucially...don't use it on our own populations?
You might need to rephrase what you are saying.

Some people have flagged your post , but i think its just translated wrong?

Sorry can you restate this? Are you saying countries should spy on their citizens more?
nah the opposite
Whoa. EU is going to LOVE this /s
Makes police raids for wrongthink much easier if the dissident used a public wifi.
Passive WiFi radar does not require the subject to connect to WiFi.

WiFi passes through many walls, floors and ceilings and those reflections can be used for human identification.

"Ambient WiFi RF displacement"