about
Samsung released a 7M model that achieved 45% on ARC-AGI-1 (arxiv.org)
34 points by chintler 360 days ago | hide | past | pdf | 12 comments on HN

In plain words: A tiny two-layer network repeatedly feeds its own answer back through itself to refine it, instead of running two networks at different speeds like the earlier design. It solved 45% of the test puzzles, beating most giant language models with less than 0.01% of their parameters.

Abstract · Less is More: Recursive Reasoning with Tiny Networks

Hierarchical Reasoning Model (HRM) is a novel approach using two small neural networks recursing at different frequencies. This biologically inspired method beats Large Language models (LLMs) on hard puzzle tasks such as Sudoku, Maze, and ARC-AGI while trained with small models (27M parameters) on small data (around 1000 examples). HRM holds great promise for solving hard problems with small networks, but it is not yet well understood and may be suboptimal. We propose Tiny Recursive Model (TRM), a much simpler recursive reasoning approach that achieves significantly higher generalization than HRM, while using a single tiny network with only 2 layers. With only 7M parameters, TRM obtains 45% test-accuracy on ARC-AGI-1 and 8% on ARC-AGI-2, higher than most LLMs (e.g., Deepseek R1, o3-mini, Gemini 2.5 Pro) with less than 0.01% of the parameters.

Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau
arXiv:2510.04871 · cs.LG, cs.AI · submitted Oct 6, 2025
abstract · pdf · html

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Oct 2025 (5 points, 1 comment) · Oct 2025 (2 points, 0 comments)

Discussed here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45506268 Less is more: Recursive reasoning with tiny networks (54 comments)

Can someone elaborate on the meaning of "7m model"?

I'm new to AI, and had an LLM spit out an explanation of why some of the "local" models don't work in Ollama on my Air, but... I don't know how accurate the AI is, heh.

It's my understanding most models are more like 1-30b (as in Billion)

They have just four small layers, rather than several dozen large layers. Off the top of my head, Gemma 3 27B has 63 layers or so. They're also larger since it has a much larger number of embedding dimensions.

Hence they end up with ~7 million weights or parameters, rather than billions.

7 million parameters
ty to you and the other poster.
Released where?
Wow this is legitimately nuts
Why?
ARC-AGI is one of the few tests on which human can complete easily while LLMs still struggle. This model scores 45% on ARC-AGI-1 and 8% on ARC-AGI-2, the latter is comparable to Claude Opus 4 and GPT-5 High, behind only Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4 Thinking, for a model about 0.001% the size of commercial models.
seems like they just stole the original HRM (just glanced at this though)