about
[Study] Conversations Gone Awry: Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failure (arxiv.org)
3 points by gnomespaceship on Jun 7, 2018 | hide | past | pdf | 1 comment on HN

In plain words: A system reads only a discussion's opening message, looking for cues like politeness or rhetorical prodding to guess whether it will turn into personal attacks. In a controlled test, those cues flagged trouble early enough to act, instead of catching attacks after they happened.

Abstract · Conversations Gone Awry: Detecting Early Signs of Conversational Failure

One of the main challenges online social systems face is the prevalence of antisocial behavior, such as harassment and personal attacks. In this work, we introduce the task of predicting from the very start of a conversation whether it will get out of hand. As opposed to detecting undesirable behavior after the fact, this task aims to enable early, actionable prediction at a time when the conversation might still be salvaged. To this end, we develop a framework for capturing pragmatic devices---such as politeness strategies and rhetorical prompts---used to start a conversation, and analyze their relation to its future trajectory. Applying this framework in a controlled setting, we demonstrate the feasibility of detecting early warning signs of antisocial behavior in online discussions.

Justine Zhang, Jonathan P. Chang, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Lucas Dixon, Yiqing Hua, Nithum Thain, Dario Taraborelli
arXiv:1805.05345 · cs.CL, cs.AI, cs.CY, cs.HC, physics.soc-ph · submitted May 14, 2018
abstract · pdf · html · To appear in the Proceedings of ACL 2018, 15 pages, 1 figure. Data, quiz, code and additional information at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~cristian/Conversations_gone_awry.html

add comment on HN
Also discussed: Nov 2020 (2 points, 0 comments) · Jun 2018 (1 point, 0 comments) · May 2018 (1 point, 0 comments) · May 2018 (2 points, 0 comments)

The paper looks at 50 million conversations across 16 million Wikipedia talk pages to create a framework for understanding linguistic markers of conversational trajectories. In a (very surprising) nutshell: if someone writes "Wow, you're coming off as a total d," the conversation is likely to end badly.